1982 Audi 80 vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1982 Audi 80 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Maserati A6G (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G.
Because 1951 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi 80 | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Audi | Maserati |
| Model | 80 | A6G |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2320 mm |
