1982 Audi 80 vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 1982 Audi 80 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 80 (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 1960 DKW Munga | |
Make | Audi | DKW |
Model | 80 | Munga |
Year Released | 1982 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 7.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 31 L |