1982 Audi 80 vs. 1963 NSU 1000 C
To start off, 1982 Audi 80 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 80 (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 NSU 1000 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 80 (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 1963 NSU 1000 C | |
Make | Audi | NSU |
Model | 80 | 1000 C |
Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 39 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 66.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 44 L |