1982 Audi 80 vs. 1964 DKW F 102
To start off, 1982 Audi 80 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1964 DKW F 102.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 DKW F 102 (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 DKW F 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 1964 DKW F 102 | |
Make | Audi | DKW |
Model | 80 | F 102 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1175 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 68 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 31 L |