1982 Audi 80 vs. 1964 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1982 Audi 80 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Isuzu Minx (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Isuzu Minx should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 100 kg more than 1982 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Isuzu Minx (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Isuzu Minx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 1964 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | 80 | Minx |
Year Released | 1982 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 40 L |