1982 Audi 80 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1982 Audi 80 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 80 (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 80 (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | 80 | 66 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |