1982 Audi 80 vs. 1977 Volvo 164
To start off, 1982 Audi 80 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80.
Because 1977 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Volvo 164 (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1977 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 1977 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | 80 | 164 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3350 mm |