1982 Audi 80 vs. 1980 Bristol Britannia
To start off, 1982 Audi 80 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bristol Britannia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bristol Britannia would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bristol Britannia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Bristol Britannia weights approximately 562 kg more than 1982 Audi 80.
Because 1980 Bristol Britannia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Bristol Britannia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 1980 Bristol Britannia | |
Make | Audi | Bristol |
Model | 80 | Britannia |
Year Released | 1982 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 82 L |