1982 Audi 80 vs. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 80 (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 179 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 80 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1982 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2580 mm |