1982 Audi 80 vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 80 (130 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 224 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 80 (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 80 | Midge |
Year Released | 1982 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |