1982 Audi 80 vs. 1997 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1997 Toyota Celica is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 80 (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1997 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1997 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 80 (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1982 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 1997 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 80 | Celica |
Year Released | 1982 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |