1982 Audi 80 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 278 kg more than 1982 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (100 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1982 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1982 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi 80 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 80 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3260 mm |
