1982 Audi 80 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X

To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 415 kg more than 1982 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (100 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1982 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1982 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: