1982 Audi 80 vs. 2001 Nissan HyperMini
To start off, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,988 cc, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan HyperMini weights approximately 95 kg more than 1982 Audi 80.
Because 2001 Nissan HyperMini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Nissan HyperMini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 80 (179 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 1982 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi 80 | 2001 Nissan HyperMini | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 80 | HyperMini |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2988 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1285 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 2670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 1900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 76 L |
