1982 Audi 80 vs. 2002 Dodge Razor

To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Razor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Razor (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Razor should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2002 Dodge Razor.

Because 2002 Dodge Razor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Dodge Razor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Razor (312 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (179 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Razor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Audi 80 2002 Dodge Razor
Make Audi Dodge
Model 80 Razor
Year Released 1982 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2144 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 130 HP 251 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 179 Nm 312 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1190 kg 1135 kg
Vehicle Length 4390 mm 3770 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1230 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 76 L