1982 Audi 80 vs. 2003 Pontiac GTO

To start off, 2003 Pontiac GTO is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pontiac GTO (350 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 760 kg more than 1982 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Pontiac GTO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Pontiac GTO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pontiac GTO (495 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Pontiac GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80. 2003 Pontiac GTO has automatic transmission and 1982 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1982 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Pontiac GTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Audi 80 2003 Pontiac GTO
Make Audi Pontiac
Model 80 GTO
Year Released 1982 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1296 cc 5665 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 59 HP 350 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 100 Nm 495 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 75 mm 99 mm
Engine Stroke Size 73.4 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.2:1 10.1:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 930 kg 1690 kg
Vehicle Length 4390 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 70 L