1982 Audi 80 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,931 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 197 kg more than 1982 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 80 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3931 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1387 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |