1982 Audi 80 vs. 2006 Ford F-350
To start off, 2006 Ford F-350 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-350 weights approximately 786 kg more than 1982 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-350 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2006 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 80 | F-350 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 144 L |