1982 Audi 80 vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 230 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (179 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 80 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |