1982 Audi 80 vs. 2008 Ford E-150
To start off, 2008 Ford E-150 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 80 kg more than 2008 Ford E-150.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2008 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 80 | E-150 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 132 L |