1982 Audi 80 vs. 2009 BMW M3
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2009 BMW M3 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | 80 | M3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8300 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 12.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 63 L |