1982 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 80 (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (50 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 339 kg more than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 80 (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1982 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2009 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | Audi | Daewoo |
Model | 80 | Matiz |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 851 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 35 L |