1982 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 80 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |