1982 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 105 kg more than 1982 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi 80 | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | 80 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |
