1982 Audi 80 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 288 kg more than 1982 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 80 | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |