1982 Audi 80 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (179 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 80 | Epica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |