1982 Audi 80 vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 80 (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 590 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 80 (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2011 Tata Nano | |
Make | Audi | Tata |
Model | 80 | Nano |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 37 L |