1982 Audi 80 vs. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 970 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera weights approximately 100 kg more than 1982 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Koenigsegg Agera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi 80 | 2012 Koenigsegg Agera | |
| Make | Audi | Koenigsegg |
| Model | 80 | Agera |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 1100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Biofuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2660 mm |
