1982 Audi 80 vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 80 (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Cube. (122 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Cube. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Cube weights approximately 78 kg more than 1982 Audi 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 80 (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1982 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 80 | Cube |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1268 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |