1982 Audi 80 vs. 2013 Hyundai Equus
To start off, 2013 Hyundai Equus is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Hyundai Equus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Hyundai Equus (423 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Hyundai Equus should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Hyundai Equus weights approximately 899 kg more than 1982 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Hyundai Equus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Hyundai Equus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Hyundai Equus (510 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Hyundai Equus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2013 Hyundai Equus | |
Make | Audi | Hyundai |
Model | 80 | Equus |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 423 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 2089 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5158 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1889 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3045 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 77 L |