1982 Audi Coupe vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1982 Audi Coupe is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi Coupe (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. (72 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi Coupe should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi Coupe weights approximately 630 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi Coupe | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
Make | Audi | Simca |
Model | Coupe | Type 11 Monoplace |
Year Released | 1982 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2250 mm |