1982 Audi Coupe vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger

To start off, 1982 Audi Coupe is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (351 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1982 Audi Coupe. (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 575 kg more than 1982 Audi Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi Coupe. (171 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi Coupe.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Audi Coupe 1969 Dodge Challenger
Make Audi Dodge
Model Coupe Challenger
Year Released 1982 1969
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2144 cc 6974 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 130 HP 351 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 171 Nm 529 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1050 kg 1625 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2800 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]