1982 Audi Coupe vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi Coupe would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1982 Audi Coupe. (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi Coupe.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi Coupe | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Audi | Caterham |
| Model | Coupe | 1700 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2260 mm |
