1982 Audi Coupe vs. 1995 Daewoo Brougham
To start off, 1995 Daewoo Brougham is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi Coupe would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi Coupe (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo Brougham. (108 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi Coupe should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 250 kg more than 1982 Audi Coupe.
Because 1995 Daewoo Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Daewoo Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi Coupe | 1995 Daewoo Brougham | |
Make | Audi | Daewoo |
Model | Coupe | Brougham |
Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |