1982 Audi Coupe vs. 1995 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1995 Toyota Celica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi Coupe would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi Coupe (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1995 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi Coupe should accelerate faster than 1995 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Toyota Celica weights approximately 45 kg more than 1982 Audi Coupe.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi Coupe (171 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1982 Audi Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi Coupe | 1995 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | Coupe | Celica |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1762 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 154 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 78 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
