1982 Audi Coupe vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi Coupe would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1982 Audi Coupe. (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 789 kg more than 1982 Audi Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi Coupe. (171 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi Coupe | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | Coupe | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 383 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |