1982 Audi Coupe vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi Coupe would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1982 Audi Coupe. (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi Coupe weights approximately 75 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Equator.

Because 2009 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 171 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles. 2009 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1982 Audi Coupe has manual transmission. 1982 Audi Coupe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Audi Coupe 2009 Suzuki Equator
Make Audi Suzuki
Model Coupe Equator
Year Released 1982 2009
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2144 cc 2501 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 130 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 171 Nm 171 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1050 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 3200 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]