1982 Audi UR vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1982 Audi UR is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 898 kg more than 1982 Audi UR.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi UR | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | UR | 62 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 2200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 79 L |
