1982 Audi UR vs. 1970 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1982 Audi UR is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1982 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 894 kg more than 1982 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi UR | 1970 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | UR | Sixty |
Year Released | 1982 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 2196 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3390 mm |