1982 Audi UR vs. 1987 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1987 Ford Fairlane is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 4,088 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1987 Ford Fairlane. (137 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 328 kg more than 1982 Audi UR.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Fairlane (304 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi UR. (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1987 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi UR | 1987 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | UR | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1982 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 304 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2950 mm |