1982 Audi UR vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1982 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 278 kg more than 1982 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 270 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi UR | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | UR | Sigma |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2730 mm |
