1982 Audi UR vs. 1996 Ford Scorpio
To start off, 1996 Ford Scorpio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Scorpio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1996 Ford Scorpio. (145 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Scorpio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Scorpio weights approximately 138 kg more than 1982 Audi UR.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Scorpio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi UR (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Scorpio. (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Scorpio.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi UR | 1996 Ford Scorpio | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | UR | Scorpio |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |