1982 Audi UR vs. 1996 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1996 Mercury Cougar is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 318 kg more than 1982 Audi UR.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi UR | 1996 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Audi | Mercury |
| Model | UR | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
