1982 Audi UR vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 653 kg more than 1982 Audi UR.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (442 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi UR. (270 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi UR. 2000 GMC Yukon has automatic transmission and 1982 Audi UR has manual transmission. 1982 Audi UR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 GMC Yukon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi UR | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | UR | Yukon |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 442 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2990 mm |