1982 Audi UR vs. 2001 Bristol Blenheim
To start off, 2001 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 96 kg more than 1982 Audi UR.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 1982 Audi UR has manual transmission. 1982 Audi UR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi UR | 2001 Bristol Blenheim | |
| Make | Audi | Bristol |
| Model | UR | Blenheim |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1398 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 105 L |
