1982 Audi UR vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi UR (197 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi UR | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | UR | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2490 mm |
