1982 Audi UR vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi UR weights approximately 862 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi UR | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Audi | Westfield |
| Model | UR | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2320 mm |
