1982 Audi UR vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 204 kg more than 1982 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi UR (270 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 1982 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi UR | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | UR | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 266 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1506 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 62 L |
