1982 Audi UR vs. 2004 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Camry. (161 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 138 kg more than 1982 Audi UR.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Toyota Camry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi UR (270 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Camry. (220 Nm). This means 1982 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi UR | 2004 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | UR | Camry |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 70 L |