1982 Audi UR vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1982 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1011 kg more than 1982 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi UR. (270 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi UR | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | UR | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 427 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 2313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 99 L |